QFR No - 8000884034
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000884034 |
NC Date | 25/07/2024 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | F2FA19033M |
Part Name | K0PG FORK PIPE MACHINED |
Supplier Name & Code | 101223-SANGKAJ BRIGHT WIRES PRIVATE L |
ETL Plant | 1146-ETL Suspension Narasapura |
Defect Details | EXCESS M/CING-DOUBLE GROOVE OPERATION |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | K0PG fork pipe ID double groove operation |
Detection Stage | Inprocess |
Problem Severity | Fitment |
NG Quantity | 3 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
Defect Sketch / Photo | l055dbjk0qj0wsubay1neyhu.jpg |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | mayursurse11@gmail.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | steel@sangkaj.com |
MD Email ID | anirudh.2007@hotmail.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
2000
|
0
|
0
|
1000
|
1000
|
4000
|
Check Qty |
1998
|
0
|
0
|
1000
|
1000
|
3998
|
NG Qty |
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
Scrap | 1 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
100% check all stock visual |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
Incoming Raw Material +Inward Inspection Raw Material+ CNC 1st set up+ CNC 2nd set up + Drilling + Air Cleaning + Final Inspection + Movement & PDI Inspection + Dispatch |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | CNC MACHINING |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | CNC CELL |
Machine / Cell No. | 2 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Man | Wrong offset given by operator at the time of rework | at time of rework operator could not judge offser 1.5mm | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Visual |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 5nos |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Doable Groove |
Why 2 | After changing insert job at lower out of specification |
Why 3 | End of shift that job rework |
Why 4 | Offset not given by operator. |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Offset not given by operator. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Doable Groove |
Why 2 | Rejected material mix-up with ok material |
Why 3 | Rejection bin provided but not daily rejection rework clear |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Rejection bin provided but not daily rejection rework clear |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | Offset not given by operator. | Supervisor | 04/08/2024 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | No |
Change Details | no changes |
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Visual |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 5 |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
no offset locking 964_Occurance_Before.png |
Occurance (After) |
Offset locking 964_Occurance_After.png |
Outflow (Before) |
rework data not available 964_Outflow_Before.png |
Outflow (After) |
Rej rework & red yellow bin available 964_Outflow_After.png |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | No |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | NO MODEL SAME AS |
12. Document Review
Documents | |
Specify Other Document | One point lesson |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 15000 |
Reason for submission | Reviewed next 3 lots found ok no issue |