QFR No - 8000884334
Defect Details
NC No. 8000884334
NC Date 26/07/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2CK00403B
Part Name CAP NUT XF1C1_1D1
Supplier Name & Code 100106-SHARP ENGINEERS.
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details DENT MARK-DENT DAMAGE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Hex damage
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 72
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@sharp-engineers.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID kurund.ma@sharp-engineers.com
MD Email ID urkhandelwal@sharp-engineers.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
3000
0
0
300
0
3300
Check Qty
1500
0
0
300
0
1800
NG Qty
72
0
0
0
0
72
 
Scrap 72
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All pipe line material segregated at ETL and Sharp end
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM incoming-Parting and drilling-CNC 1st Turning-CNC 2nd Turning-MPI inspection-plating-Final inspection-PDI- Packing and forwarding
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation RM
Outsource Yes
Machine / Cell -
Machine / Cell No. -
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodFixture not clean properlyFixture clean properly also Clamping is on Across flatO
MethodSetting not oksetting ok, if setting done wrong then all material will get rejectedO
MethodBright bar not insert properly in traub machineBar inserted properly also clamping is on Across flatO
ToolTool wear outFound tool okO
MaterialMaterial grade changeMaterial found as per specificationO
MaterialRae Material ConditionRaw Material found in damaged conditionX
MachineParameter not set as per specificationVerified and found as per specificationO
ManNew manpowerNo new manpowerO
ManUnskill ManpowerManpower available as per skill matrixO
ToolTool damagedFound ok conditionO
MachinePower cutNo power cutO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 5
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Dent Mark-damaged
Why 2 Damaged at Across corner
Why 3 Received RM is damaged condition
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Received RM is damaged condition
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Dent Mark-damaged
Why 2 Damaged at Across corner
Why 3 skip from inspection
Why 4 inspection on sampling basis
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) inspection on sampling basis
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceStarted 100% Verification at incoming stageMr. Ravi Pande05/08/202405/08/2024Completed
OutflowStarted 100% inspection at final inspectionOmkar Bhange05/08/202405/08/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Started 100% inspection at FI
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Inspection on sampling basis at incoming stage
974_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) Started 100% inspection of hex bar at incoming stage
974_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) Inspection on sampling basis
974_Outflow_Before.jpeg
Outflow (After) started 100% inspection at FID with Marking
974_Outflow_After.jpeg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant NA
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP
Specify Other Document NA
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission ok