QFR No - 8000884335
Defect Details
NC No. 8000884335
NC Date 26/07/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2DZ00912O
Part Name FORK BOLT - K8
Supplier Name & Code 101263-SINGLA PRECISION SCREWS
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-OD O/S FITMENT NG
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description OD O/S
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 11
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@singlaprecision.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID quality@singlaprecision.com
MD Email ID aditya@singlaprecision.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
540
0
0
2000
2000
4540
Check Qty
540
0
0
2000
2000
4540
NG Qty
11
0
0
0
0
11
 
Scrap 11
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
We Checked 100% material lying at Various stage
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Raw material +Part off +Drilling +Punching +Drilling +Tapping +CNC Machine +Rolling +Re-Tapping +Finish +Final Inspection +Packing
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Punching
Outsource Yes
Machine / Cell Punching
Machine / Cell No. 01
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineMaterial to Swell in Punching ProcessValidation And Found NGX
MaterialRM GRADE AND SIZE NOT OKVALIDATION ANF FOUND OKO
ManUNAWARENESS OF OPERATORVALIDATION AND FOUND OPERATOR SKILL LEVEL LOWX
ToolPunching tool wear outValidation and Found OKO
MethodForging Part checking gauge not effectiveValidation And Found NGX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size sampling
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-OD
Why 2 Material to swell in Punching process
Why 3 After Punching Process not CLG Process Add
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) CLG operation not add after Punching process
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-OD
Why 2 Inspection Plan was not Effective
Why 3 final inspection standard checking Frequency change 100% Gauge implements
Why 4 As per sampling Plan part checking in final inspection
Why 5 Ng part skipped from inspection and machine
Root Cause (Outflow) final inspection standard checking Frequency change 100% Gauge implements
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Outflowfinal inspection standard checking Frequency change 100% Gauge implementsMr Ganesh Maurya31/07/202401/08/2024Completed
OccuranceCLG operation not add after Punching processMr Ganesh Maurya31/07/202401/08/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details final inspection standard checking Frequency change OD -100% Gauge implements
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) CLG operation not add after Punching process
975_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) CLG operation add after Punching process
975_Occurance_After.jpeg
Outflow (Before) Final Inspection standards as per sampling plan
975_Outflow_Before.jpeg
Outflow (After) Final Inspection standards 100% OD Dia checked
975_Outflow_After.jpeg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant clg machine -01
 
12. Document Review
Documents Drawing
Specify Other Document PFMEA ,Final insp St
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission 5. Problem Analysis - Need all 4M 7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance & Outflow) - Not clear