QFR No - 8000887715
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000887715 |
NC Date | 20/08/2024 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | 52GQ01013O |
Part Name | M/CYL BODY PDC BORE BURNISHED -K11,K2, |
Supplier Name & Code | 101100-CAST 4 ALUMINIUM PVT LTD |
ETL Plant | 1120-ETL K-226/2 Disc Brakes |
Defect Details | BLOW HOLES-BH AFTER MACHINING |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | BLOW HOLES-BH AFTER MACHINING |
Detection Stage | Inprocess |
Problem Severity | Function |
NG Quantity | 58 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | info@cast4aluminium.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | info@cast4aluminium.com |
MD Email ID | kiran@cast4aluminium.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
1000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
456
|
1456
|
Check Qty |
1000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
456
|
1456
|
NG Qty |
695
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
103
|
798
|
Scrap | 695 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
Not ok parts rejected and scrapped. |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
RM inward & inspection -- melting -- N2 degassing -- PDC -- gate cutting -- inspection -- fettling -- shot blasting -- inspection -- packing & dispatch |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | PDC |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | PDC machine |
Machine / Cell No. | PDC machine no. 8 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Method | Material cleaning freq. not adequate | no | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Visual |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 100% |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Blow hole observed in bore of master cylinder. |
Why 2 | Impurities observed in material. |
Why 3 | material cleaning freq. was decided but not effective. |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | material cleaning freq. was decided but not effective. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Blow hole observed in bore of master cylinder. |
Why 2 | New inspector was working on boroscope inspection. |
Why 3 | Understanding of defects was less in inspector. |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Understanding of defects was less in inspector. |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | Material cleaning freq. revised i.e. thrice in a shift. | Mubarak | 27/08/2024 | 27/08/2024 | Completed |
Outflow | Training given to inspector regarding understanding of defects. | Mahesh G. | 27/08/2024 | 27/08/2024 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | No |
Change Details | Na |
Inspection Method | Instrument |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 100% |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
NA 1034_Occurance_Before.pdf |
Occurance (After) |
Cleaning freq. decided thrice in a shift and updated in CP. 1034_Occurance_After.pdf |
Outflow (Before) |
NA 1034_Outflow_Before.png |
Outflow (After) |
Awareness given to inspector. 1034_Outflow_After.jpeg |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | All master cylinders |
12. Document Review
Documents | ControlPlan, InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | NA |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 200 |
Reason for submission | No blow hole found in 200 Nos lot. |