QFR No - 8000890049
Defect Details
NC No. 8000890049
NC Date 05/09/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 52DR00505O
Part Name FASTENING CAP TAPPED-FINISHED C101 CBS
Supplier Name & Code 101261-BHOGALE AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIM
ETL Plant 1120-ETL K-226/2 Disc Brakes
Defect Details LENGTH OVERSIZE-LUG HEIGHT OVERSIZE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description LENGTH OVERSIZE-LUG HEIGHT OVERSIZE
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 1020
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID nikhil.kulkarni@bhogaleauto.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID rajendra.randive@bhogaleauto.com
MD Email ID
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
1076
0
0
1200
0
2276
Check Qty
1076
0
0
1200
0
2276
NG Qty
494
0
0
570
0
1064
 
Scrap 0
Rework 1064
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
1. Informed to production & inspection responsible. 2. 1076 nos verified for 1.5 mm distance at ETL.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Receipt inspection > Forging > Heat treatment > Trimming > Grinding > Drilling > Chamfering > Powder coating > Final inspection > Packaging & dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Grinding
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Belt grinder
Machine / Cell No. Belt grinder
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineBelt supporting plate is not oSupporting plate worn out and part on belt pressed in tapered mannerO
MethodWrong holding of part for grindingDue to wrong holding part grinding is taperedO
ManPart face ground tapered by operatorDue to manual process always possibility of taper.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 10 nos
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 After coating dimension 1.5 mm (i.e. lug heights difference) found undersized.
Why 2 In grinding lug heights and face not maintained.
Why 3 While grinding at lug bottom face, surface formed tapered.
Why 4 Grinding machine belt supporting plate worn out
Why 5 Belt supporting plate check point not available.
Root Cause (Occurance) Grinding machine belt supporting plate worn out.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 After coating dimension 1.5 mm (i.e. lug heights difference) found undersized.
Why 2 Defect not trace out in final inspection
Why 3 In final inspection distance 1.5 mm checked as single point to point difference. Not con
Why 4 Point to point difference on tapered portion not measured on height gauge pointer.
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Face to face difference on tapered portion not measured on height gauge pointer.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowInspection by vernier caliper implementedNSK04/09/2024Completed
Occurance1. Belt supporting plate to be changed.BAPL05/09/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Inspection by vernier caliper implemented in final inspection till issue resolved.
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Belt supporting plate worn out due to friction with the belt while pressing the part.
1082_Occurance_Before.png
Occurance (After) The supporting plate of belt grinder is to be replaced with new one.
1082_Occurance_After.png
Outflow (Before) Measurement carried out by height gauge.
1082_Outflow_Before.png
Outflow (After) Measurement method changed as vernier caliper from height gauge
1082_Outflow_After.png
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant NA
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PMCheckSheet
Specify Other Document NA
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 500
Reason for submission Improvement found in current lots