QFR No - 8000894023
Defect Details
NC No. 8000894023
NC Date 01/10/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 530DA00507
Part Name TOP SPRING LOCATOR
Supplier Name & Code 100161-PREMIER ENGINEERS
ETL Plant 1118-ETL E-92,93 Suspension
Defect Details POWDER COATING NOT OK-POWDER COATING PEEL OFF
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description POWDER COATING PEEL OFF
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 106
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality.premier@sanghavigroup.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID prabhune.girish@sanghavigroup.co.in
MD Email ID sanghavi.rajesh@sanghavigroup.co.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
208
0
0
0
0
208
Check Qty
208
0
0
0
0
208
NG Qty
106
0
0
0
0
106
 
Scrap 106
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Available lot Qty 208 Nos Segregated for peel off Issue by heating Method.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM+Forming +Piercing+Vibro+Powder coating+final Inspection+Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Powder Caoting
Outsource Yes
Machine / Cell Tulja Enterprises
Machine / Cell No. Powder Coating L
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodExcess Powder Coating at OD edgeDue to new coater powder coating observed excess on part EdgeO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method DFT meter Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size DFT Chech
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 TSL Powder Coating Peel off at Edge
Why 2 Powder Coating Thickness Observed More on part Edge
Why 3 Excess powder observed ( more than 120Micron )observed on Edge
Why 4 New Coater in place of regular coater absentism
Why 5 No new coater powder spraying training for powder DFT 60 to 70
Root Cause (Occurance) Excess powder coating on part and its Edge
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 TSL Powder Coating Peel off at Edge
Why 2 Not detected at final Inspection stage
Why 3 Sampling basis DFT verification
Why 4 visual method of 100% Inspection not followed
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Sampling basis DFT verification
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowInspection frequency increased for DFT verification and 100& visual inspection followed for Excess coating on EdgeMr.Vishal15/10/2024Completed
OccuranceTraining provided to available coater for Powder Coating thickness within 60-70 MicronMr.Mahendra Patil15/10/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Inspection Qty increased for DFT Inspection also 100% powder verification at edge for excess powder coating
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Double sampling
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 20/100
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Excess Coating
1126_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) No Excess Coating training provided to coater.
1126_Occurance_After.jpg
Outflow (Before) No Training to Coater, Coater Training provided
1126_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Training Provided to Coater
1126_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Other Locator also
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document Final Training
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 1000
Reason for submission After taking action no powder coating peel off observed on part.