QFR No - 8000896112
Defect Details
NC No. 8000896112
NC Date 17/10/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2KH01002B
Part Name REBOUND SPRING-XF121
Supplier Name & Code 101159-TECHNOMAT SPRINGS
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details BEND-BEND
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Bend
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 6
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@technomatsprings.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID technomatsprings@gmail.com
MD Email ID patilsadanand@technomatsprings.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
15000
0
0
28000
0
43000
Check Qty
15000
0
0
28000
0
43000
NG Qty
6
0
0
0
0
6
 
Scrap 6
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Checked all material at customer end and pipeline material also.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
R/m In-warding Inspection > Coiling > Stress Relieving-1 > Grinding > Shot Peening > Stress Relieving-2 > Final Inspection > Oiling > Packing > Dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation coiling
Outsource No
Machine / Cell -
Machine / Cell No. -
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MaterialWrong Material / GradeSupplier RMTC Report checked found OkO
ManUnskilled OperatorSkilled matrix found okO
ToolTool Loose / Tool thread wear outfound pitch tool locking bolt thread wear outX
MachineMachine check Sheet not followedFound machine JH activity done as per the mentioned freq.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 50 Nos
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Un-Grounded Spring observed.
Why 2 Grinding operation not done.
Why 3 spring length undersized in coiling operation.
Why 4 Due to pitch tool locking thread wear out.
Why 5 No check point available for thread locking wear out in JH check sheet.
Root Cause (Occurance) No check point available for thread locking wear out in JH check sheet.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Un-Grounded Spring observed.
Why 2 Defective parts escaped from inspection.
Why 3 Defective parts was few due to that not arrested in insp.
Why 4 Inspection Done on sampling Basis.
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Inspection done on sampling basis and defective parts were less so not arrested in final inspection.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Outflow100% Visual Inspection started.Mr. Anuj Shelke07/11/202407/11/2024Inprocess
OccuranceCheck point added in JH check sheet.Mr. Khandare07/11/202407/11/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100% visual inspection started.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) In the JH check sheet,the nut bolt looseness point was not mentioned.
1167_Occurance_Before.xlsb
Occurance (After) In the JH check sheet, nut bolt looseness point has been added.
1167_Occurance_After.xlsb
Outflow (Before) Inspection done as per the sampling plan.
1167_Outflow_Before.xlsb
Outflow (After) 100% inspection has started.
1167_Outflow_After.xlsb
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Horizontally deployed for the all similar machines.
 
12. Document Review
Documents JHCheckSheet
Specify Other Document NA
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission