QFR No - 8000896118
Defect Details
NC No. 8000896118
NC Date 17/10/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2FQ00507B
Part Name HOLDER HANDLE P/C-XF-1C1
Supplier Name & Code 100001-ANANT ENTERPRISES
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details B/H INSIDE BORE-BLOW HOLE,CUT MARK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description CUT MARK
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 70
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID anandkulkarni@anantgroup.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID pramodgosavi@anantgroup.co.in
MD Email ID ashwinjoshi@anantgroup.co.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
0
0
0
205
160
365
Check Qty
0
0
0
203
152
355
NG Qty
0
0
0
2
8
10
 
Scrap 10
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Under cut part segregated at our end and scraped separately for the same. ICA mark started back side on part surface for the confirm free from cut mark on part.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Raw material Inspection=Melting=Spectro=Metal transfer to holding furnace=Degassing=Die preparation=Casting=Riser cutting=Inspection=Buffing=Heat treatment=Inspection=Powder coating=Inspection=Machining=deburring=Pre-Washing=Final Inspection=Packing Dispatched
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Casting=HT=PC=M/C
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Plat Form number 03
Machine / Cell No. Machine Number 04
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManUnskilled manpowerSkill matrix verified and found okO
MethodBuffing processBuffing process done by manual, some part profile not matched during buffingX
MaterialMaterial not okMaterial grade check and found as per specification.O
MachineMachine condition not okMachine condition verified and PM done as per defined frequencyO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 cut mark observed on part
Why 2 Cut mark observed on part due to buffing not done properly
Why 3 Buffing not done properly due to buffing process is manual
Why 4 Buffing process is manual due to some part profile not match process
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Buffing process is manual due to some part profile not match in process
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Cut mark observed on part
Why 2 Cut mark part skipped by inspector
Why 3 Part skipped by inspector due to part not catch by inspector at final stage
Why 4 cut mark part not catch by inspector due to eyes sequence not followed
Why 5 Eyes sequence not followed due to operator negligence
Root Cause (Outflow) Eyes sequence not followed due to operator negligence
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowQ- alert displayedNisar19/10/202419/10/2024Completed
OutflowAwareness training given to all Inspector regarding customer complaint.Nisar A20/10/202420/10/2024Completed
OccuranceQ alert and defect matrix displayedNisar A.19/10/202419/10/2024Completed
OccuranceStart to five numbers part check in every hrs in buffing process.Ambar22/10/202422/10/2024Completed
OccuranceTraining has given to all buffing operator regarding customer complaintNisar A.20/10/202420/10/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details No any change in process
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Q- alert display
1173_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Training given to al regarding customer complaint
1173_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Q alert displayed
1173_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Awareness training given to al inspector regarding customer complaint
1173_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All holder and bracket
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP
Specify Other Document No Any
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission ok