QFR No - 8000902705
Defect Details
NC No. 8000902705
NC Date 09/12/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2FQ00407B
Part Name HOLDER HANDLE UPPER P/C (XF-521)
Supplier Name & Code 201092-PRANEEL INDUSTRIES
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details DENT MARK-DENT DAMAGE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description DENT MARK
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 8
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo 3tkupsqk0tnofazl2odnzfet.jpg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@praneelgroup.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID praneelindustries@rediiffmail.com
MD Email ID anilpatil@praneelgroup.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
320
0
0
0
100
420
Check Qty
320
0
0
0
100
420
NG Qty
20
0
0
0
6
26
 
Scrap 20
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All material at ETL end and in-house material verify and rejected at ETL end also at in - house
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Raw casting inward - Drilling - Powder Coating - Powder coating inward - VMC Machining - De- burring - Final Inspection - packing and dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation VMC MACHINING
Outsource No
Machine / Cell VMC CELL
Machine / Cell No. VMC MACHINE
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodDeburring not done as per work instructionVerify the deburring method by operator and found inadequateX
Machinemachine parameter required not as per control planverify the machine parameter as clamping pressure found okO
ToolRequired tooling for part production not as per standardverify the tooling for productionO
Manfinal inspector not as per skill matrixverify the skill for final inspector and found inspector as per skill matrixO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100 %
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Dent damage found on parts
Why 2 Clamping pressure not as per control plan specification
Why 3 Part handling not done as per material handling Work instruction
Why 4 De-burring process not done properly as per Work instruction
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) handling process not done as per Work Instruction
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Dent damage issue on part
Why 2 Part skipped by final inspector
Why 3 During material packing dent damage done
Why 4 No awareness to the inspector as well as packing person for dent damage
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) lack of awareness to final inspector as well as packing person
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowTraining and awareness given to the final inspector as well as packing person for dent damageMr. Vilas Chavan20/12/202420/12/2024Completed
OccuranceTraining given to operator of material handling process for material handling should be done as per Work instruction DISPLAYMr Sudarshan Kadam20/12/202420/12/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details ---
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100 %
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Operator not aware about dent damage issue on the part
1266_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Training and awareness given to operator for handling material
1266_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) No any awareness about dent damage issue observed on the parts
1266_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Training and awareness given to final inspector for dent damage issue observed on the also Q alert display for the raise concern by ETL
1266_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Handle Holder Lower
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document Q- Alert
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission ok