QFR No - 8000903666
Defect Details
NC No. 8000903666
NC Date 14/12/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2FA30233B
Part Name FORK PIPE MACHINED
Supplier Name & Code 101223-SANGKAJ BRIGHT WIRES PRIVATE L
ETL Plant 1146-ETL Suspension Narasapura
Defect Details MATERIAL DEFECT-FORK PIPE CRACK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description K1KG front fork leakage observed in fork pipe area because of fork pipe material issue(crack)
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Safety
NG Quantity 1
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo vqoek5tfr3bscmjep4y15qyt.gif
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID kolarbright@sangkaj.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID steel@sangkaj.com
MD Email ID anirudh.2007@hotmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
3920
0
0
2000
3000
8920
Check Qty
3739
0
0
2000
3000
8739
NG Qty
181
0
0
0
0
181
 
Scrap 181
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All material segregated from TI Supplier(ETL+Sangkaj)
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Tube Forming+ Annealing+ Wet Process + Push Pointing + Drawing + Stress releving + Straightening + eddy current testing + cut length + facing & chamfering + final inspection + packing
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation tube forming
Outsource Yes
Machine / Cell TI
Machine / Cell No. 1
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineEddy current testing flaw detection failureECT software hanging issue faced while tube testing & re-started the PCO
MachineWeld Bond area Low Heat PenetrationDuring mill running tow bar & impeder unit serviced due to coolant flow blockageO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method eddy current testing
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 5 nos
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Weld Bond area Low Heat Penetration.
Why 2 Impeder to strip edge EMF conductivity Low
Why 3 Insufficient coolant flow to impeder core.
Why 4 Impeder coolant flow line blockage due to oxide chips & sludge.
Why 5 Coolant Flow line orifice diameter insufficient
Root Cause (Occurance) Coolant Flow line orifice diameter insufficient
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Eddy current testing flaw detection failure
Why 2 ECT may accepted the Flaw product.
Why 3 Momentary failure of Ect software TEST ON signal output
Why 4 System software hang while ECT process period
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) System software hang while ECT process period
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceTow bar inner diameter increased from 3mm to 6mm for free flow of coolantMr Maharajan21/12/202421/12/2024Completed
OutflowSystem software hang while ECT process period.Mr Maharajan18/12/202418/12/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details no change
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Eddy current testing
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 5 nos
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Tow bar inner diameter 3mm which is blocked due to fine oxide chips interruption.
1277_Occurance_Before.png
Occurance (After) Tow bar inner diameter increased from 3mm to 6mm for free flow of coolant.
1277_Occurance_After.png
Outflow (Before) System software hang while ECT process period.
1277_Outflow_Before.png
Outflow (After) To prevent defect outflow, the ECT conveyor will be stopped after 3seconds in case of “ECT software hang & TEST signal not indicated
1277_Outflow_After.png
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant no
 
12. Document Review
Documents
Specify Other Document no
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 20000
Reason for submission Reviewed 20000 no`s found ok