QFR No - 7000829356
Defect Details
NC No. 7000829356
NC Date 02/04/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520AE00400
Part Name CORE PLATE REDUCED 612
Supplier Name & Code 100959-AAR CEE ENGINEERING WORKS UNIT
ETL Plant 1135-ETL 7/10 P Nagar
Defect Details SURFACE FINISH NOT OK-
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Shot Blasting not done on plates and in some plates Shot blasting done on one side.
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 5000
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID qc@aarceeengg.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID planthead.diecasting@aarceeengg.com
MD Email ID vaibhav.arora@aarceeengg.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
5000
0
0
0
0
5000
Check Qty
5000
0
0
0
0
5000
NG Qty
5000
0
0
0
0
5000
 
Scrap 0
Rework 5000
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
5000 pcs lot return back to supplier end (AAR CEE), New Ok lot provided for the same.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
1. Receipt of Raw Material 20. Storage of Raw Material 30. Holding Cum Melting 40. PDC 50. Trimming 60. Shot Blasting 70. Barrelling 80. Sound Testing 90. Stress Relieving 100. Final Inspection & Packing 110. Storage & Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation 60. Shot Blasting
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Shot Blasting Machine
Machine / Cell No. SBM-02
5. Problem Analysis
-------
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 05 pieces
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Shot blasting was not done due to Shot leakage from the shot blasting machine
Why 2 Shot leakage due to machine body wear out from the backside of the machine
Why 3 Machine body wear out due to liner bolt broken
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Liner Bolt broke at the inner side of the liner.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Shot blasting was not done on core plates due to final inspectors were not able to detect the pieces
Why 2 Due to barrelling process, it is not possible to detect such kinds of pieces by final inspectors
Why 3 Ra value checks at only PDIR after barrelling process.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Ra value checks at only PDIR after barrelling
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
-------
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details At final inspection WI Ra value checkpoint to be added to check per hour
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 5pcs/hr
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) The liner bolt broke at the inner side of the liner
38_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) The Liner bolt changed
38_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) At final inspection only PDIR done
38_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Now at the final inspection Roughness value to be checked for every hour & if roughness found less then lot to be hold & re-shot blasting to be done
38_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All core plate models
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document No other documents
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission ok