QFR No - 7000873898
Defect Details
NC No. 7000873898
NC Date 02/11/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. 533BW00102
Part Name BUMP STOP
Supplier Name & Code 101023-FORES ELASTOMECH INDIA PVT. LT
ETL Plant 1126-ETL Pantnagar
Defect Details DAMAGES-Flashes and cut marks
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Flash and cut mark
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 1140
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo 1y2tfrc3sjh55rzkgshxu2me.jpg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID malani.pritam@foresgroup.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID singh.barinder@foresgroup.com
MD Email ID swamy.pj@foresgroup.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
20000
0
0
8000
0
28000
Check Qty
1140
0
0
8000
0
9140
NG Qty
1140
0
0
44
0
1184
 
Scrap 1184
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100 % sorting done at M/s ETL End with third party & also sorting done at Fores End.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Rubber & Chemical - Inward inspection - Rubber Mixing - Hardness inspection - Moulding - Visual inspection - Standard packing & Dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Rubber Moulding
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Moulding
Machine / Cell No. Moulding
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineLess or more temperaturePLC control / Machine stop if parameter not okayO
MaterialWrong material usedWe have checked hardness data last six month & found okayO
ToolMould tool not okayMould leakageX
MachineLess or more curing time .PLC control / Machine stop if parameter not okayO
ManSkipped from inspection .NG parts found at customer End .X
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 4000
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 During deflashing operation .
Why 2 Difficult to deflashing due to thick flash
Why 3 Material flow not uniform due to mould leakage .
Why 4 Mold parallelism not okay .
Why 5 Mold tool PM frequency is Less .
Root Cause (Occurance) Mold tool PM frequency is Less .
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Flash & cut mark on part .
Why 2 NG part found at customer end .
Why 3 Inspector not aware .
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Inspector not aware .
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowTraining & awareness given to inspector. OPL display at inspection stage .Mr Amar15/10/202214/10/2022Completed
OccuranceMould PM frequency Increase .Mr Ravi11/10/202211/10/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Visual inspection .
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 4000
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Mould Leakage .
298_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Blue matching done & mould parallelism found okay. Mould PM frequency Increase from 7000 shots to 5000 Shots .
298_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) inspector not aware .
298_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Training & awareness given to inspector. OPL display at inspection stage.
298_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Applicable for all Bumps stop parts .
 
12. Document Review
Documents InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document N/A
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 1
Reason for submission Found OK