QFR No - 7000987844
Defect Details
NC No. 7000987844
NC Date 20/02/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520JT05102
Part Name PLATE CLUTCH PIAGGIO
Supplier Name & Code 101138-HINDUSTAN PRESSINGS PVT.LTD.
ETL Plant 1132-ETL K-226/1 TRANSMISSION
Defect Details CRACK-Crack issue
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Plate Clutch observed Crack
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 3900
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo odwx25kgwj1e0posgteq0nl2.jpg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality.p1@hpplindia.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID spatil@hpplindia.com
MD Email ID rakesh@hpplindia.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
3900
0
0
0
0
3900
Check Qty
3900
0
0
0
0
3900
NG Qty
88
0
0
0
0
88
 
Scrap 88
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
We have imidiate action check for crack and NG parts segragation done.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM - Blanking/Piercing - Sandering - Nitriding - Dishing - Final Inspection - Packing
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Dishing
Outsource No
Machine / Cell PP 17
Machine / Cell No. 110T
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManFINAL INSPECTION NOT CHECKE DPROPPELYINSPECTOR CHECKED IN GAUGE AFTER REWOK JOBX
MethodREWOK JOB NOT PROPERLY DONEEXCESS PRESSURE GIVEN ON PART OBSERVED IN VISUAL DEFECTX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method ViSUAL INSPECTION
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size LOT SIZE
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Crack found
Why 2 Parts gets excess pressure during staraightning process
Why 3 Rework parts (Go gauge not Ok) passing through process
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Rewok Parts (Go Gauge not Ok) passing througth Straigjtning proces
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Crack found
Why 2 100% inspection done ok parts.In rework parts check visual inspection
Why 3 Inspector aware about the checking hair line crack in rework parts.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Inspector aware about the checking hair line crack in rework parts.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceWI for the rework parts (Go gauge not Ok) passed throught straightning and check parts visualyy by 100% and parts indetified seperatlyMr. Hitendra Patil(HPPL) and Mr, Kiran(HPPL)07/03/202409/03/2024Completed
OccuranceTraininh give to supervisor and opearartor to rework procedure.Mr. Hitendra Patil(HPPL) and Mr, Kiran(HPPL)07/03/202409/03/2024Completed
Outflow1. Inspector training regarding all final inspection of rework job by 100% 2. 100% checked the gauge passing throught plates and varify the experienced senior QA person for next 3 lotMr.Kiran ( HPPL12/03/202413/03/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details REWORK PARTS VISUAL INSPECTION DONE AS PER WORK INSTRUCTION.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method VISUAL
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size LOT SIZE
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Work instruction not avilable
687_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) We have training given to opearator as per work instruction
687_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Check job visually not q alerat avilable
687_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Q alert display on finl inspection
687_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All parts
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP
Specify Other Document NO
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 1000
Reason for submission OK