QFR No - 7001005905
Defect Details
NC No. 7001005905
NC Date 15/04/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 53BKZ00102
Part Name RUBBER BUSH
Supplier Name & Code 101023-FORES ELASTOMECH INDIA PVT. LT
ETL Plant 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand
Defect Details DIMETER UNDERSIZE-Outer dia undersize
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description OD found undersize 23.637 mm against specification 24.3+0.3/-0.3 mm
Detection Stage Customer End
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 10000
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID malani.pritam@foresgroup.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID singh.barinder@foresgroup.com
MD Email ID swamy.pj@foresgroup.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
17500
0
7500
0
0
25000
Check Qty
17500
0
7500
0
0
25000
NG Qty
20
0
0
0
0
20
 
Scrap 20
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100 % inspection by ring gauge at final Inspection & dot marking provided on parts 100%
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Inward material- Mixing - Moulding- Buffing process- Final Inspection
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Buffing process
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Machine no-01
Machine / Cell No. 01
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ToolTool design not okayOD maintained in Tool is 24.20X
MethodInspection on sampling basisSkipped from inspectionX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100 %
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 OD undersize
Why 2 OD undersize on parting line
Why 3 OD undersize due to buffing process at parting line
Why 4 OD dimension got undersize due to excess buffing process.
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) OD dimension got undersize due to excess buffing process.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 OD undersize
Why 2 Skipped from Inspection
Why 3 Inspection as per sampling
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Inspection as per sampling
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Occurance1)Training Given to buffing operator 2)OPL display at work station 3)Work Instruction updated 4)Frequency of inspection increases from 2 hourly to 1 hourlyBuffing process InCharge16/04/202416/04/2024Completed
OccuranceDimension of OD in Mould will be maintained 24.5 mmFores26/04/202426/04/2024Completed
Outflow1)Training given to inspector 2)Q Alert displayed 3)Defective sample & limit sample to displayed 4)Dot marking started after inspection 5)OD inspection by Ring gauge 100 %Final Inspection16/04/202416/04/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Inspection by ring gauge
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100 %
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Excess buffing
749_Occurance_Before.jpg
Occurance (After) Training record of buffing operator
749_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Inspection on sampling
749_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Training record of Final inspector
749_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant NA
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA
Specify Other Document Work instruction
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5
Reason for submission Tool OD modified from 24.2 to higher tolerance side 24.5 mm in die . No Ng parts found in fresh upcoming lots .