QFR No - 7001014528
Defect Details
NC No. | 7001014528 |
NC Date | 16/05/2024 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | F1GN01102B |
Part Name | MAIN SPRING K86A |
Supplier Name & Code | 100186-SAGAR SPRINGS PRIVATE LIMITED |
ETL Plant | 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand |
Defect Details | DIMN.U/SIZE.-Tip thickness undersize. |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | Tip thickness specified 0.8 mm min observation 0.20 mm (NG) |
Detection Stage | Receipt |
Problem Severity | Function |
NG Quantity | 1020 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | No |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | quality@sagarsprings.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | ajai.singh@sagarsprings.com |
MD Email ID | sagar@sagarsprings.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
4080
|
0
|
4500
|
0
|
0
|
8580
|
Check Qty |
4080
|
0
|
4500
|
0
|
0
|
8580
|
NG Qty |
1020
|
0
|
250
|
0
|
0
|
1270
|
Scrap | 20 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
100%inspection at ETL HALOL PLANT |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
COILING,TEMPRING,GRINDING.,SHOT PEENING ,2ND TEMPRING,WAVINESS |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Grinding stage |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | Grinding |
Machine / Cell No. | Grinding |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Man | Unksilled operator not set machine properly and check it properly result in to generation of rejecti | Found operator deputed are well understood of grinidng process and deffect it cause and counter meas | O |
Material | Wrong grade wheel result on grinding performance | Check the grade of wheel used ie ceramic wheel | O |
Method | Faulty program will result into more feed, full grinding, less grinding or taper grinding in some ca | Check the program used for grinding it was found OK | O |
Method | Grinding angle more | Grinding angle found 300 to 350deg and tip thickness found less than 0.80 mm | X |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Instrument |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | Sample pla |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Grinding angle more |
Why 2 | Grinding angle measures 300° to 350° against specification 320° minimum |
Why 3 | Grinding angle maintained at higher band causing thickness less |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Grinding angle maintained at higher band (300° to 350°) causing thickness less |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Tip thickness less |
Why 2 | Inspection done on sampling basis |
Why 3 | |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Inspection done on sampling basis |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outflow | 100% Visual inspection started for grinding angle at grinding stage | VDP | 01/06/2024 | 01/06/2024 | Completed |
Occurance | At grinding stage grinding angle will be maintained 320 deg minimum | VDP | 01/06/2024 | 01/06/2024 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | No |
Change Details | No change |
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | 100% Visual inspecti |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 10 no/1000 |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
At Grinding stage Grinding angle maintained 300° to 350° 805_Occurance_Before.pdf |
Occurance (After) |
At Grinding stage Grinding angle maintained 320° deg minimum to maintain tip thickness 0.80 mm. 805_Occurance_After.pdf |
Outflow (Before) |
Inspection on sampling basis. 805_Outflow_Before.pdf |
Outflow (After) |
100% Inspection for Grinding angle at Grinding stage. 805_Outflow_After.pdf |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | No |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | Action applicable for this part only. |
12. Document Review
Documents | ControlPlan, PFMEA |
Specify Other Document | In-process Inspectio |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 5 |
Reason for submission | Tip thickness found less against specified 0.8 mm min. |