QFR No - 7001014528
Defect Details
NC No. 7001014528
NC Date 16/05/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F1GN01102B
Part Name MAIN SPRING K86A
Supplier Name & Code 100186-SAGAR SPRINGS PRIVATE LIMITED
ETL Plant 1136-ETL Suspension Sanand
Defect Details DIMN.U/SIZE.-Tip thickness undersize.
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Tip thickness specified 0.8 mm min observation 0.20 mm (NG)
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 1020
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@sagarsprings.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID ajai.singh@sagarsprings.com
MD Email ID sagar@sagarsprings.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
4080
0
4500
0
0
8580
Check Qty
4080
0
4500
0
0
8580
NG Qty
1020
0
250
0
0
1270
 
Scrap 20
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100%inspection at ETL HALOL PLANT
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
COILING,TEMPRING,GRINDING.,SHOT PEENING ,2ND TEMPRING,WAVINESS
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Grinding stage
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Grinding
Machine / Cell No. Grinding
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManUnksilled operator not set machine properly and check it properly result in to generation of rejectiFound operator deputed are well understood of grinidng process and deffect it cause and counter measO
MaterialWrong grade wheel result on grinding performanceCheck the grade of wheel used ie ceramic wheelO
MethodFaulty program will result into more feed, full grinding, less grinding or taper grinding in some caCheck the program used for grinding it was found OKO
MethodGrinding angle moreGrinding angle found 300 to 350deg and tip thickness found less than 0.80 mmX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Instrument
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size Sample pla
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Grinding angle more
Why 2 Grinding angle measures 300° to 350° against specification 320° minimum
Why 3 Grinding angle maintained at higher band causing thickness less
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Grinding angle maintained at higher band (300° to 350°) causing thickness less
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Tip thickness less
Why 2 Inspection done on sampling basis
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Inspection done on sampling basis
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
Outflow100% Visual inspection started for grinding angle at grinding stageVDP01/06/202401/06/2024Completed
OccuranceAt grinding stage grinding angle will be maintained 320 deg minimumVDP01/06/202401/06/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details No change
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method 100% Visual inspecti
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 10 no/1000
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) At Grinding stage Grinding angle maintained 300° to 350°
805_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) At Grinding stage Grinding angle maintained 320° deg minimum to maintain tip thickness 0.80 mm.
805_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Inspection on sampling basis.
805_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) 100% Inspection for Grinding angle at Grinding stage.
805_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Action applicable for this part only.
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA
Specify Other Document In-process Inspectio
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5
Reason for submission Tip thickness found less against specified 0.8 mm min.