QFR No - 7001030732
Defect Details
NC No. 7001030732
NC Date 05/07/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. B2QL00502O
Part Name PISTON RETURN SPRING - K11, K2
Supplier Name & Code 101159-TECHNOMAT SPRINGS
ETL Plant 1120-ETL K-226/2 Disc Brakes
Defect Details SURFACE FINISH NOT OK-Rusty
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Rusty
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 9000
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@technomatsprings.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID technomatsprings@gmail.com
MD Email ID patilsadanand@technomatsprings.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
9000
0
0
15000
1000
25000
Check Qty
9000
0
0
15000
1000
25000
NG Qty
9000
0
0
0
0
9000
 
Scrap 0
Rework 9000
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Check available material.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM > Coiling > SR1 > Grinding > Inspection > Final Inspection > Oiling > Packing > Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Oiling
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Oiling Machine
Machine / Cell No. Oiling
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManUNSKILL OPERATORVERIFICATION OF SKILL MATRIXO
ToolNANAO
MaterialTHE MATERIAL WAS STUCK AT OILING STAGE.VERIFIED THE OILING STAGE,THE MATERIAL WAS STUCKED AT OILING STAGE.X
MethodImproper Oiling MethodVERIFICATION OF METHODO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 50 Nos
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 MATERIAL GET RUSTY
Why 2 ALL MATERIAL OILING COVERAGE NOT DONE PROPERLY.
Why 3 THE MATERIAL WAS STUCK AT OILING STAGE.
Why 4 THE MATERIAL WAS NOT IMMEDIATELY OILED AFTER INSPECTION
Why 5 THE OPERATOR WAS NOT AWARE ABOUT IMMEDIATELY OILING THE MATERIAL AFTER INSPECTION.
Root Cause (Occurance) SPRING GET RUSTY DUE TO THE OPERATOR WAS NOT AWARE ABOUT IMMEDIATELY OILING THE MATERIAL AFTER INSPECTION.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 MATERIAL GET RUSTY.
Why 2 Defective parts escaped from inspector.
Why 3 Inspection Done on sampling Basis.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Inspection Done on sampling Basis.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceAfter Grinding process we will do oiling and after that 100% final inspection.Mr. Anuj25/07/202425/07/2024Completed
OutflowWe will do 100% inspection before material dispatch.Mr. Anuj31/07/202425/07/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details NA
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) After grinding process we are doing inspection and after that oiling.
903_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Grinding process we will do oiling and after that 100% final inspection.
903_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) We were previously checking the material as per the sampling plan.
903_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) We have started 100% inspection before dispatch.
903_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Oiling Mc
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document NA
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 250
Reason for submission Improvement found in next lots