QFR No - 8000787719
Defect Details
NC No. 8000787719
NC Date 17/05/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. F1LG00902B
Part Name SEAT PIPE -K86A
Supplier Name & Code 100929-HARSHAD ENGINEERING COMPANY
ETL Plant 1146-ETL Suspension Narasapura
Defect Details HIGHT U/SIZE.-TOTAL LENGTH LESS ISSUE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description K0LA seat pipe total length less issue
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 1
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo nqppngc1jzrocztqb5vn0rur.xlsx
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID qaharshad@miteshauto.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID mitesh@miteshauto.com
MD Email ID auto.mitesh@gmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
4000
0
0
375
1100
5475
Check Qty
4000
0
0
375
1100
5475
NG Qty
1
0
0
0
0
1
 
Scrap 1
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
1. 100 % sorting done at ETL 2. 100 % sorting done by length gauge checking at HEC wip & FG stock
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
"10 - Raw Material Annealed and Phosphated "20-A - Cutting & 20-B- Cutting wt. "30-A MOS Application 30 -B Multistation Draw "40-A- Head Formation "40-B Inward/Incoming Inspection "50 - Rough Grinding "60-A CNC Head Turning , Facing. 60-B Facing & Boring 60-C Tapping "70A - Punching 70B-Chamfering "80-A - Finish grinding 80-B Buffing "90-A- De-burr 90-B- Final/Visual Inspection "100-A ID Cleaning Diesel 100-B - Ultrasonic cleaning "110-A- Visual Inspection at Q gate 110-B - Rust oil Application "120 - Packing & Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation CNC
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC facing & drilling machine
Machine / Cell No. 141, 144
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineImproper loading during facing operationimproper loadingX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 50nos
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Total Length under size
Why 2 Part loaded 2.0 mm offset while facing operation
Why 3 while total length facing operation part not correctly loaded
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) while total length facing operation part not correctly loaded
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Total Length undersize
Why 2 total length skip from inspector
Why 3 100% inspection not done for total length
Why 4 As per sampling inspection done
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) 100% inspection not done for total length
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceTraining given to CNC operator for loading of partsKamil and Yogesh26/05/2022Completed
Outflow100% inspection started for total lengthVaibhav Sirshat26/05/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100% inspection done for total length
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Sampling inspection for total length
124_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) 100% inspection for Total Length
124_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Not available
124_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Training and awareness given to inspector
124_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant CNC
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, WISOP
Specify Other Document WI and C/P
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5000
Reason for submission reviewed 5000 no length issue found ok