QFR No - 8000790517
Defect Details
NC No. 8000790517
NC Date 08/06/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2DZ04603B
Part Name FORK BOLT J1A & J1D
Supplier Name & Code 101263-SINGLA PRECISION SCREWS
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-M38 THREADING NOT OK
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description M38 THREADING NOT OK
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 58
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo z00fl2pbvmq5dnlexw5yl2nz.pptx
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@singlaprecision.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID quality@singlaprecision.com
MD Email ID aditya@singlaprecision.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
100
5000
0
5000
0
10100
Check Qty
100
5000
0
5000
0
10100
NG Qty
10
0
0
0
0
10
 
Scrap 10
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
dot mark on head
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
1.RAW MATERIAL 2.CUTTING 3.BUFFING 4.DRILLING&FACING 5.TAPPING 6.CNC TURNING 7.MILLING 8.BACK FACE BUFFING&MILLING BURR REMOVE 9.SURFACE TREATMENT 10.FINAL INSPECTION
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation threading op
Outsource No
Machine / Cell 202
Machine / Cell No. 2
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManMISHANDLING OF MATERIALDURING TRANSPORTATION 1 PIECE FELL DOWN FROM BIN AND THREAD GOT DAMAGEO
MethodINSPECTION METHOD NOT EFFECTIVECHECKED AND VALIDATED ,FOUND EFFECTIVEX
MaterialRAW MATERIAL GRADE NOT OKCHECKED AND VALIDATED ,FOUND OKX
ToolROLLING DIE WEARCHECKED AND VALIDATED ,FOUND OKX
MachineNUT AND BOLTS OF MACHINE MAY LOOSECHECKED AND VALIDATED FOUND PROPERLY TIGHTX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 50/1200
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 M38 Threading not ok
Why 2 The problem occurred at transportation stage.
Why 3 During transportation 1 piece fell down from bin and thread got damage.
Why 4 Operator was new and put the N.G part along with the OK part bin.
Why 5 So One piece of thread damage got mixed with finished material .
Root Cause (Occurance) During transportation 1 piece fell down from bin and thread got damage.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 M38 Threading not ok
Why 2 Operator was not aware about this type of defect.
Why 3 This type of problem came first time so the defected part skipped from detection.
Why 4 So final inspector was not able to detect this problem.
Why 5 So NG part dispatched to customer.
Root Cause (Outflow) Operator was not aware about this type of defect.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceWork instructions given to Operator about the defect and to handle the material with proper care.NAVEEN08/06/202207/06/2022Completed
OutflowWork instructions given to final inspector regarding the defect and to check the material with gauge before packing and dispatch.UMED08/06/202207/06/2022Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details no
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 50/1200
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) NOT AVAILABLE
171_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) WORK INSTRUCTIONS
171_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) NOT AVAILABLE
171_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) WORK INSTRUCTIONS
171_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required No
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant NOT APPLICABLE
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document NO
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 100
Reason for submission As discussed with local representative Mr Ambhore Raosaheb- Plan for packaging improvement and share line of action through mail