QFR No - 8000801908
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000801908 |
NC Date | 27/08/2022 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | F2FQ00507B |
Part Name | HOLDER HANDLE P/C-XF-1C1 |
Supplier Name & Code | 100001-ANANT ENTERPRISES |
ETL Plant | 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension |
Defect Details | NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-CASTING DEFECTS |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | Handle Holder crack |
Detection Stage | Customer End |
Problem Severity | Safety |
NG Quantity | 1 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | No |
Defect Sketch / Photo | v31ykdfkq2upwkxneduumktr.pptx |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | anandkulkarni@anantgroup.co.in |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | pramodgosavi@anantgroup.co.in |
MD Email ID | ashwinjoshi@anantgroup.co.in |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
2112
|
3638
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5750
|
Check Qty |
2112
|
3638
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5750
|
NG Qty |
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
Scrap | 2 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
Stock segregation done at ETL & Warehouse also Inspection marking implemented in half bore. |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
10) RM receiving >>> 20) Storage>>> 30) Melting>>> 40) Degassing>>> 50) Casting>>>60) Cutting>>> 70)Grinding>>> 80) Heat treatment>>>90) Buffing>>>100) Powder coating>>>110) Machining>>> 120) Final inspection 130) Packaging & Forwarding |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Casting |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | 4 |
Machine / Cell No. | 1 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Method | Molten metal pouring not OK | Pouring net not implemented during molten metal pouring, | X |
Man | Operator skill | Semi skilled Operator - L2 | O |
Material | Inclusion in metal | Metal cleaning frequency decided, Twice per lot. | O |
Tool | Casting eject before solidification | Casting ejection done after solidification timer | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Visual Inspection |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 100% |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Impurity in Holder due to pouring net not using |
Why 2 | Pouring net not using |
Why 3 | Lack of awareness |
Why 4 | Lack of training |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | No awareness to use pouring net. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Holder Crack or broken due to strength reduced |
Why 2 | Impurity in holder. |
Why 3 | Impurity can not visualize at final inspection. |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Impurity can not visualize at final inspection. |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | WI modified to Use the Pouring net. | Kailas Adhave | 27/08/2022 | Pending | |
Outflow | Inspection marking has been implemented in half bore. | Kailas Adhave | 26/08/2022 | Pending | |
Outflow | OPL given to inspector & operator | Kailas Adhave | 26/08/2022 | Pending | |
Occurance | Pouring net implement during metal pouring in die | Pramod Gosavi | 27/08/2022 | Pending | |
Occurance | Q-Alert displayed at shop floor | Kailas Adhave | 27/08/2022 | Pending | |
Occurance | Training has been give to die operator | Mahesh Punde | 27/08/2022 | Pending |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Inspection identification implemented in half bore. |
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Visually |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 100% |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Without pouring net 232_Occurance_Before.bmp |
Occurance (After) |
Pouring net Implemented 232_Occurance_After.bmp |
Outflow (Before) |
Only DOT mark was implemented 232_Outflow_Before.jpg |
Outflow (After) |
Inspection mark - Inspector initial implemented 232_Outflow_After.bmp |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | Upper bracket |
12. Document Review
Documents | ControlPlan, PFMEA, InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | no |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | |
Reason for submission |