QFR No - 8000801908
Defect Details
NC No. 8000801908
NC Date 27/08/2022
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2FQ00507B
Part Name HOLDER HANDLE P/C-XF-1C1
Supplier Name & Code 100001-ANANT ENTERPRISES
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-CASTING DEFECTS
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Handle Holder crack
Detection Stage Customer End
Problem Severity Safety
NG Quantity 1
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo v31ykdfkq2upwkxneduumktr.pptx
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID anandkulkarni@anantgroup.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID pramodgosavi@anantgroup.co.in
MD Email ID ashwinjoshi@anantgroup.co.in
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
2112
3638
0
0
0
5750
Check Qty
2112
3638
0
0
0
5750
NG Qty
1
1
0
0
0
2
 
Scrap 2
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Stock segregation done at ETL & Warehouse also Inspection marking implemented in half bore.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
10) RM receiving >>> 20) Storage>>> 30) Melting>>> 40) Degassing>>> 50) Casting>>>60) Cutting>>> 70)Grinding>>> 80) Heat treatment>>>90) Buffing>>>100) Powder coating>>>110) Machining>>> 120) Final inspection 130) Packaging & Forwarding
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Casting
Outsource No
Machine / Cell 4
Machine / Cell No. 1
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MethodMolten metal pouring not OKPouring net not implemented during molten metal pouring,X
ManOperator skillSemi skilled Operator - L2O
MaterialInclusion in metalMetal cleaning frequency decided, Twice per lot.O
ToolCasting eject before solidificationCasting ejection done after solidification timerO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Impurity in Holder due to pouring net not using
Why 2 Pouring net not using
Why 3 Lack of awareness
Why 4 Lack of training
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) No awareness to use pouring net.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Holder Crack or broken due to strength reduced
Why 2 Impurity in holder.
Why 3 Impurity can not visualize at final inspection.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Impurity can not visualize at final inspection.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceWI modified to Use the Pouring net.Kailas Adhave27/08/2022Pending
OutflowInspection marking has been implemented in half bore.Kailas Adhave26/08/2022Pending
OutflowOPL given to inspector & operatorKailas Adhave26/08/2022Pending
OccurancePouring net implement during metal pouring in diePramod Gosavi27/08/2022Pending
OccuranceQ-Alert displayed at shop floorKailas Adhave27/08/2022Pending
OccuranceTraining has been give to die operatorMahesh Punde27/08/2022Pending
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Inspection identification implemented in half bore.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visually
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Without pouring net
232_Occurance_Before.bmp
Occurance (After) Pouring net Implemented
232_Occurance_After.bmp
Outflow (Before) Only DOT mark was implemented
232_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) Inspection mark - Inspector initial implemented
232_Outflow_After.bmp
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Upper bracket
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document no
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission