QFR No - 8000813650
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000813650 |
NC Date | 09/12/2022 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | F2DZ09002B |
Part Name | FORK BOLT -K17E |
Supplier Name & Code | 100189-SANGKAJ STEEL PVT LTD. |
ETL Plant | 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension |
Defect Details | NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-M6 NO-GO PASS |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | M6 No-Go pass in fork bolt |
Detection Stage | Receipt |
Problem Severity | Fitment |
NG Quantity | 330 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | qualityassurance@sangkaj.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | steel@sangkaj.com |
MD Email ID | anirudh.2007@hotmail.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
1000
|
0
|
0
|
1000
|
1000
|
3000
|
Check Qty |
330
|
0
|
0
|
1000
|
1000
|
2330
|
NG Qty |
30
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
30
|
Scrap | 30 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
Lot booked after found 30 nos NG at inward end, also re-verified the in-house stock. |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
Inward Inspection > Forging blank > CNC 1ST > CNC 2nd > Drilling > Tapping > Rolling > Plating > Final Inspection |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Drilling |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | Tapping |
Machine / Cell No. | 2 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Machine | Collet Wear out | Drill fitment issue | X |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Sampling basis (DVC) |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 10 OUT 100 |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Drill ID O/S |
Why 2 | Drill Overhanging |
Why 3 | Play in collet |
Why 4 | Collet wear out |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Collet wear out found |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | NG Piece not traced in sampling basis |
Why 2 | sampling frequency found not effective |
Why 3 | |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | sampling frequency at FID found not effective (10%) |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurance | Collet replaced with new one having close clamping having facility of clamp more area of drill bit. so that overhanging possibility get eliminate | Mr. Raut Sir | 12/12/2022 | 10/12/2022 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Checking frequency increased to 100 % |
Inspection Method | Sp. Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 100% |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Collet Wear Out drill bit overhanging due to clamping area less. 318_Occurance_Before.pptx |
Occurance (After) |
Collet replaced with new one having close clamping having facility of clamp more area of drill bit. so that overhanging possibility get eliminate. 318_Occurance_After.pptx |
Outflow (Before) |
sampling frequency at FID found not effective (10%) 318_Outflow_Before.jpeg |
Outflow (After) |
100 % Inspection Lot 318_Outflow_After.pdf |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | Drilling Machine 1 & 2 |
12. Document Review
Documents | InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | FID Checksheet |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 300 |
Reason for submission | Next 3 lot checked and found ok |