QFR No - 8000822306
Defect Details
NC No. 8000822306
NC Date 01/03/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. B2TD00626O
Part Name ANCHOR PIN 9 MM DIA - REML
Supplier Name & Code 100846-SANGKAJ ENGINEERING PVT.LTD.
ETL Plant 1156-ETL Disc Brake P'Nagar
Defect Details DIMN.U/SIZE.-OPERATION MISS
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description operation miss & wrong thread pieces received
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 22
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID aslam@sangkaj.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID pardeshinr@sangkaj.com
MD Email ID anirudh.2007@hotmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
5480
0
0
0
0
5480
Check Qty
4000
0
0
0
0
4000
NG Qty
22
0
0
0
0
22
 
Scrap 22
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Segregation done at ETL-Pantnagar End
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Raw material inward-wire draw-cold forging-CNC machining-Rolling-Heat treatment-plating-final inspection-PDI-dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Cold forging
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Cold forging
Machine / Cell No. 19B4S
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineSemi finished part fallen down in chute and got mix with OK parts at cold forging stage.Cause verified.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Anchor pin 9mm, dimn U/S and operation missing found at ETL
Why 2 Incomplete operation part found with ok parts
Why 3 Part fallen down through 3rd station ,where 4th station is final station.
Why 4 Part skipped through part shifting fingers.
Why 5 Fingers worn out.
Root Cause (Occurance) Part shifting fingers worn out.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Anchor pin 9mm, dimn U/S and operation missing found at ETL
Why 2 NG parts got mixed with Ok parts at final inspection.
Why 3 Final inspection is carried out visually.
Why 4 At visual inspection more than one part holding in hand by inspector.
Why 5 Part holding method while doing visual inspection is wrong.
Root Cause (Outflow) Part holding method while doing visual inspection is wrong.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceWork instruction reviewed and updated to ensure condition of fingers.Mr. Shrikant Magar20/03/202316/03/2023Completed
OutflowOPL displayed to ensure one part at a time should be hold.Aslam Shaikh15/03/202315/03/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Part holding method has been changed , now only one part at a time is being hold while doing visual inspection.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Assuring of condition of fingers of cold forging was not in process as not mentioned in WI for setup.
383_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) WI updated and training also provided to assure condition of fingers of cold forging machine
383_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) No instruction for visual inspection of individual part.
383_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) OPL provided for visual inspection to educate for proper material inspection.
383_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Anchor pin 8mm
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP
Specify Other Document no
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission done