QFR No - 8000823929
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000823929 |
NC Date | 20/03/2023 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | F2FA01200B |
Part Name | FORK PIPE RAW K23A (W/O HARDENING) |
Supplier Name & Code | 101066-TUBE INVESTMENTS OF INDIA LIMI |
ETL Plant | 1116-ETL K-120 Suspension |
Defect Details | NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-HARDNESS & THICKNESS NG |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | 1) Fork pipe Hardness (28±4HRC) observed up to 12 ~15 HRC. 2) Thickness variation observed up to 0.35mm. |
Detection Stage | Inprocess |
Problem Severity | Safety |
NG Quantity | 5 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | Yes |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | AmitVD@tii.murugappa.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | guptaajay@tii.murugappa.com |
MD Email ID | mukeshahuja@tii.murugappa.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
52407
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
52407
|
Check Qty |
52407
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
52407
|
NG Qty |
5945
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5945
|
Scrap | 5945 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
100 % Inspection done by using Eddy Sorter machine in available Qty. 52407 Nos. at ETL End. |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
Drawing- Tempering-Straightning-Edyy Current Testing-Cutting-Final Inspection. |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Tempering Process |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | Online Tempering Machine |
Machine / Cell No. | 13A106 |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Machine | Power - 203kw , Speed 16 MPM Speed reduced by 4 MPM | 1. Hardness found 22-25HRC and not matching with failed part Hardness 2. No visual difference | O |
Machine | Power -200kw , Speed 14 MPM Speed reduced by 6 MPM | 1. Hardness found 22-25HRC and not matching with failed part Hardness 2. No visual difference | O |
Machine | Tube Jerk: Tube holding 2 -3 sec and repeat the same for 3 times in same tube | Hardness found ok | O |
Machine | Power -241KW , Speed -20MPM Power increased by 40KW | 1. Hardness found 23-28HRC and not matching with failed part Hardness 2. No visual difference | O |
Machine | Speed -20mpm , Power -203KW | Hardness found ok | O |
Machine | Tube Stuck-up: Tube holding time 5- 6 sec | 1. Hardness found 14-15 HRC and matching with failed part Hardness 2. end portion is hardness found | X |
Machine | Power - 230 KW ,Speed -20MPM Power increased by 30KW | 1. Hardness found 24-28HRC and not matching with failed part Hardness 2. No visual difference | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Pokayoke |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | /JOB ORDER |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | Tube bend during process |
Why 2 | Tube low hardness |
Why 3 | Tube low hardness at temering |
Why 4 | Tube excess tempering |
Why 5 | Tube struck up at tempering for more than 5 seconds |
Root Cause (Occurance) | Tube struck up at tempering for more than 5 seconds |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Tube bend during the process |
Why 2 | Tube low hardness |
Why 3 | NG tube mixed with ok tube |
Why 4 | No identification of NG tube |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | No identification of NG tube |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outflow | Separate bucket provided for NG tubes | Mr. Rajkumar | 30/03/2023 | 30/03/2023 | Completed |
Occurance | 1. Interlocking of tube struck up (more than 3 seconds) and tempering coil power off | Mr. Rajkumar | 30/03/2023 | 30/03/2023 | Completed |
Outflow | Auto Paint spray system introduced during tube struck up in tempering line more than 3 seconds | Mr. Rajkumar | 30/03/2023 | 29/03/2023 | Completed |
Outflow | .Hardness verification point added at tempering stage for each job order | Mr. Rajkumar | 30/03/2023 | 29/03/2023 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Hardness verification added during tempering |
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Hardness verificatio |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | /job order |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
NIL 393_Occurance_Before.pdf |
Occurance (After) |
1. Interlocking of tube struck up (more than 3 seconds) and tempering coil power off
2. Auto Paint spray system introduced during tube struck up in tempering line more than 3 seconds 393_Occurance_After.pdf |
Outflow (Before) |
NIL 393_Outflow_Before.pdf |
Outflow (After) |
1. Hardness verification point added at the tempering stage for each job order
2. Separate buckets provided for NG tubes 393_Outflow_After.pdf |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | Online Tempering machines at PAN TPI |
12. Document Review
Documents | WISOP, InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | No |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | |
Reason for submission |