QFR No - 8000826358
Defect Details
NC No. 8000826358
NC Date 15/04/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. S2CW00307B
Part Name D NUT DUKE 200 WITH CANISTER
Supplier Name & Code 100106-SHARP ENGINEERS.
ETL Plant 1118-ETL E-92,93 Suspension
Defect Details DIAMETER OVER SIZE-O/D OVER SIZE SPE=21.0+0.30 OBS=21.60MM
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description DIAMETER OVER SIZE-O/D OVER SIZE SPE=21.0+0.30 OBS=21.60MM
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 499
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@sharp-engineers.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID kurund.ma@sharp-engineers.com
MD Email ID urkhandelwal@sharp-engineers.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
540
0
0
0
0
540
Check Qty
540
0
0
0
0
540
NG Qty
499
0
0
0
0
499
 
Scrap 499
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Inspection done with DVC for ETL End Material
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Receipt & Inspection, Parting and Drilling, CNC I, CNC II, Milling, Deburring, Heat Treatment, Shot Blasting, Powder Coating, Inward Inspection, Final Inspection, PDI, Packing & Forwarding
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation 1st Setup CNC
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC
Machine / Cell No. 8
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ToolInsert wear outInsert life defined found OKO
MaterialHard MaterialTC verified found OKO
MachineMachine parameter not OKVerified and found all parameter within specO
MethodCoating thickness allowanceOD dimn maintained 21+0.3, No Coating allowanceX
ManUnskilled manpowerOperator level defined, found adequateO
MethodNo checkpoint for OD 21+0.3Checkpoint added but on sample basis with DVCX
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method DVC
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size as per CP
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Fitment issue in D Nut Canister Duke 200
Why 2 OD 21+0.3 mm oversized
Why 3 Dimension maintained 21+0.3 as per CP
Why 4 After coating Diameter oversized
Why 5 No coating allowance kept
Root Cause (Occurance) Diameter observed oversized Due to No coating allowance
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Fitment issue in D Nut Canister Duke 200
Why 2 OD 21+0.3 mm oversized
Why 3 Not detected during inspection
Why 4 sample basis inspection with DVC
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Sample basis inspection with DVC
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccurancePlating allowance kept 0.2 mmQA Suprvisor20/04/202318/04/2023Completed
OutflowChecking method changed from DVC to Snap Gauge with Controlled Size 21+0.1mm onlyProduction Supervisor20/04/202318/04/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Checking method changed from DVC to Snap Gauge with Controlled Size 21+0.1mm only
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size IS 2500
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) No powder coating allowance at machining stage
411_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Considering powder coating allowance Size put as 21.0+0.1mm at machining stage.
411_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Before no any inspection done for the OD size 21.0+0.30mm at Final inspection.
411_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) After complaint for the OD Size 21.0+0.30mm inspection started by Snap Gauge 100%.
411_Outflow_After.pdf
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant D Nut XF1C1 1D1- E92
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document -
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 500
Reason for submission Evidence of Countermeasure not relevant with respect to Action Submitted, Resubmit Again