QFR No - 8000849095
Defect Details
NC No. 8000849095
NC Date 19/10/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. 550LG06702
Part Name SEAT PIPE-(HMS-30 & HMP-30)
Supplier Name & Code 100929-HARSHAD ENGINEERING COMPANY
ETL Plant 1143-ETL Suspension Halol, Vadodara
Defect Details RUN OUT MORE-OD GREEOVE RUNOUT FOUND UPTO 1.49 MM
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Hex OD Runout 1.49 mm found against 0.5 mm with respect to thread
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Function
NG Quantity 2
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo gh5t3exnukab30icfhh4ky1b.jpg
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID qaharshad@miteshauto.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID sjkadam@miteshauto.com
MD Email ID auto.mitesh@gmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
8000
6000
4000
5000
3500
26500
Check Qty
8000
6000
4000
5000
3500
26500
NG Qty
2
0
0
1
0
3
 
Scrap 3
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
100 % sorting done for ETL End, HEC WIP & FG material with identification/star mark on each box
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Cutting-Draw-Head Formation-Rough Grinding-CNC (Head, Boring & Tapping)-Punching-Finish Grinding-Final Inspection-Packing-Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Tapping
Outsource No
Machine / Cell Tapping machine
Machine / Cell No. 161
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineDrilling Spindle TR Bad Found uptoFound upto 0.07 mm, spec. 0.05 mmX
MachineCollet TR wrt Tapping Spindle not okFound upto 0.03 against 0.05 mmO
MachineFace cutter TR BadFound ok within 0.02 against 0.05 mmO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Sp. Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size As IS 2500
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Groove Runout wrt Threading found Excess
Why 2 Threading Conc. wrt shank Dia. excess
Why 3 Bore Conc. wrt OD excess
Why 4 Boring/Drilling Spindle alignment found 0.07 to 0.08 against 0.05 mm.
Why 5 Boring Spindle alignment disturb
Root Cause (Occurance) Boring Spindle alignment disturb
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Groove Runout wrt Threading found Oversize
Why 2 Skipped From Final inspection
Why 3 Sampling Insp. plan followed
Why 4 Not detect while inspection
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Not detect while sampling inspection
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceDrilling Spindle TR wrt Collet checking freq. decided on weekly BasisDDJ02/11/2023Completed
OccuranceDrilling Spindle TR set within 0.03 mmD.D. Jopale30/10/202331/10/2023Completed
OutflowCollet Wise Runout check as per in-process insp. freq.QA Inspector02/11/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details NA
Inspection Method Sp. Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size IS2500
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Drilling Spindle alignment disturb
586_Occurance_Before.pdf
Occurance (After) Drilling Spindle TR set within 30 Microns by using dial gauge, Weekly Spindle TR checking Freq. decided
586_Occurance_After.pdf
Outflow (Before) Parts check by using lever dial gauge as per sampling freq.
586_Outflow_Before.pdf
Outflow (After) Gauge Made to check bore conc. wrt shank & Runout checked collet-wise as per In-process Insp. freq. daily basis.
586_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant CNC, CS & SPM
 
12. Document Review
Documents InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document NA
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 10
Reason for submission ok