QFR No - 8000877855
Defect Details
NC No. 8000877855
NC Date 11/06/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 520BZ00102
Part Name CAP OIL LOCK-LML
Supplier Name & Code 101255-MAHAVIR INDUSTRIES
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-ID STEP
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description ID step
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 56
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@mahavirind.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID planthead@mahavirind.co.in
MD Email ID
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
730
0
0
0
1460
2190
Check Qty
730
0
0
0
1460
2190
NG Qty
56
0
0
0
0
56
 
Scrap 56
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All Suspected Material Segregation at customer End .
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Inward - store- Traub Parting and boring - Bottom side chamfer- CNC Turning and Boring - OD Grinding- Plating- Final Inspection - Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation CNC Turning and Boring
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CNC Section
Machine / Cell No. CNC nO-2
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ToolWrong Tool UseBoring Shank dia 8mmTool Use On CNC Machine .X
MethodInspection Wrong10nos Per Bin ID Visual On Final Inspection Stage .X
ManMan UnskilledAs Per Skilled Matrix Operator is SkillO
MaterialHard MaterialHardness 75-78 HRBO
MachineMachine Condition Not OKAs per PM schedule Machine Condition is OKO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 10nos/Bin
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-ID STEP
Why 2 ID STEP Defect Observed On CNC machine
Why 3 Tool Vibration During Boring Operation On CNC
Why 4 Boring tool Shank was Weak on CNC machine .
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Boring tool Shank was Weak on CNC machine .
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-ID STEP
Why 2 Final Inspection Stage ID Visual Sampling Frequency Very Low
Why 3
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Final Inspection Stage ID Visual Sampling Frequency Very Low
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowID Visual Sampling Increase 50Nos/Bin Instead of 5NosQuality Head13/06/202414/06/2024Completed
OccuranceBoring Tool Replace Shank dia Kept 11mm Instead of 8mm.Production Head13/06/202415/06/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details ID Visual Inspection Frequency Change 50Nos /bin Instead of 5nos.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 50Nos/Bin
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Boring tool Shank was Weak on CNC machine .
855_Occurance_Before.docx
Occurance (After) Boring Tool Replace Shank dia Kept 11mm Instead of 8mm.
855_Occurance_After.docx
Outflow (Before) Final Inspection Stage ID Visual Sampling Frequency Very Low
855_Outflow_Before.jpg
Outflow (After) ID Visual Sampling Increase 50Nos/Bin Instead of 5Nos
855_Outflow_After.jpg
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All Cap Models
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA
Specify Other Document Nil
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 100
Reason for submission OK