QFR No - 8000879507
Defect Details
NC No. 8000879507
NC Date 22/06/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2PH00902B
Part Name VALVE RETAINER (C101B)
Supplier Name & Code 101255-MAHAVIR INDUSTRIES
ETL Plant 1146-ETL Suspension Narasapura
Defect Details DAMAGES-MACHINING ISSUES
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description valve retainer machining issue
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 4
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo i2z4kjrrzalkbmbwopa4sgmv.gif
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@mahavirind.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID planthead@mahavirind.co.in
MD Email ID
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
1200
0
0
0
9000
10200
Check Qty
1200
0
0
0
9000
10200
NG Qty
2
0
0
0
0
2
 
Scrap 2
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All Suspected Material Segregation at Customer End
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Inward - Store- Parting on Traub Machine - CNC counter boring and facing - OD Grinding- plating-- Final Inspection - Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation OD Grinding
Outsource No
Machine / Cell CLG-05
Machine / Cell No. Grinding Cell
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ToolWrong Grinding Wheel UseAs Per Store Record Ok CUMI Make Grinding Wheel Use.O
MaterialHard And other grade Material UseHardness 75-80 HRB and as per required grade CEW-1 Material Use.O
MachineMachine Condition Not oK or RPM overMachine Condition ok But Control Wheel RPM was 45-60X
MethodProcess &Inspection Method WrongProcess Method Ok But Inspection Method After OD Grinding visual frequency Very LowX
ManUnskilled operatorAs per Skilled Matrix Operator is SkilledO
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 DAMAGES-MACHINING ISSUES
Why 2 Part Not Proper OD Grinding On Grinding Machine
Why 3 While OD grinding process, the part gets inverted.
Why 4 Control Wheel RPM was Over
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Control Wheel RPM was Over
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 DAMAGES-MACHINING ISSUES
Why 2 Final Inspection stage Not Detect During Visual sampling Inspection
Why 3 After OD Grinding Process & Final Inspection stage visual frequency Very Low
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) After OD Grinding Process & Final Inspection stage visual frequency Very Low .
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowSampling Frequency Increase 50nos Per 500Nos Instead Of 20/500nos& After Visual Inspection Tick Marks On OD at Final Stage.Quality Head31/07/202401/08/2024Completed
OccuranceControl wheel RPM Reduce 30-45 Instead Of 45-60Production Head30/07/202401/08/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details Sampling Frequency Increase & After Visual Inspection Tick Marks On OD at Final Stage.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Control Wheel RPM was Over
879_Occurance_Before.docx
Occurance (After) Control wheel RPM Reduce 30-45 Instead Of 45-60
879_Occurance_After.docx
Outflow (Before) After OD Grinding Process & Final Inspection stage visual frequency Very Low
879_Outflow_Before.docx
Outflow (After) Sampling Frequency Increase 50nos Per 500Nos Instead Of 20/500nos& After Visual Inspection Tick
879_Outflow_After.docx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant All Valve Retainer
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA
Specify Other Document no
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 5000
Reason for submission Reviewed