QFR No - 8000889507
Defect Details
NC No. 8000889507
NC Date 02/09/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2FQ00307B
Part Name HOLDER HANDLE LOWER P/C (XF-521)
Supplier Name & Code 201092-PRANEEL INDUSTRIES
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details DENT MARK-DENT DAMAGE, PIN HOLE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description DENT DAMAGE
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Aesthetic
NG Quantity 16
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@praneelgroup.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID praneelindustries@rediiffmail.com
MD Email ID anilpatil@praneelgroup.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
350
0
0
0
200
550
Check Qty
350
0
0
0
200
550
NG Qty
27
0
0
0
30
57
 
Scrap 57
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All material at ETL end and In-house sagrigation done and NG parts rejected at both location.
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Raw Casting Inward=>CNC Setup=>Powder Coating=>VMC setup=>De-burring=>Final Inspection=>Packing and Dispatch.
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation VMC Machining
Outsource No
Machine / Cell VMC Machine
Machine / Cell No. VMC Cell
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
MachineClamping pressure not as per CP.Verify clamping pressure as per CP and found OK.O
ToolToolings used for part production is not as per standard.Verify the toolings used for part production and found adequate.O
ManUnskilled manpower for inspection.Verify skill matrix for inspector and found skilled person.O
MethodInspection method not as per standard.Verify inspection method and found inadequate.X
MaterialMaterial not as per specifications.Verify matertial composition and found as per specifications.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size samp.plan
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Pin hole observed on the parts after powder coating.
Why 2 Powder used for the process contains trapped air and moisture.
Why 3 Degreesing bath deep time for surface cleaning is found low for cleaning the parts.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Degreesing bath deep time for surface cleaning is found low for cleaning the parts.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Pin hole observed on the parts after powder coating.
Why 2 Skipped from final inspection stage.
Why 3 Final inspector was unable to identify pin hole defect properly.
Why 4 Due to low lux level inspector was unable to identify the pin hole issue.
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Due to low lux level inspector was unable to identify the pin hole issue.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OutflowNew high power LED tube installed at final inspection stage to increase the optimal lux level.Mr. Yogesh Sonune12/09/202412/09/2024Completed
OccuranceDegreesing bath deep time for surface cleaning increases from 5-7 min to 7-9 min for cleaning the parts.Mr.Dhawale11/09/202412/09/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System No
Change Details ---
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Before Degree sing bath time 5-7 min available for part cleaning process.
1064_Occurance_Before.jpeg
Occurance (After) After Degree sing bath time 7-9 min done for part cleaning process.
1064_Occurance_After.jpeg
Outflow (Before) Lux level on the final inspection found low for inspection and no awareness about pin hole on the parts.
1064_Outflow_Before.pptx
Outflow (After) Lux level increase on the final inspection for visual inspection also awareness and training given to inspector.
1064_Outflow_After.pptx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Handle Holder Upper
 
12. Document Review
Documents WISOP
Specify Other Document Q-alert,Training rec
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission OK