QFR No - 8000895378
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000895378 |
NC Date | 13/10/2024 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | 530MJ00102 |
Part Name | SPRING SEAT |
Supplier Name & Code | 100144-AURANGABAD PRESSINGS |
ETL Plant | 1118-ETL E-92,93 Suspension |
Defect Details | DIAMETER OVER SIZE-O/D OVER SIZE SPE=81.0+/-0.50 OBS=83.90 |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | DIAMETER OVER SIZE-O/D OVER SIZE SPE=81.0+/-0.50 OBS=83.90 |
Detection Stage | Inprocess |
Problem Severity | Fitment |
NG Quantity | 5 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | No |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | quality@apw3.co.in |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | aurangabadpressings@apw3.co.in |
MD Email ID | shashikant@apw3.co.in |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
3000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
10000
|
13000
|
Check Qty |
3000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3000
|
NG Qty |
5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
Scrap | 5 |
Rework | 0 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
All Material segregation at ETL end |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
Blanking /Is forming /piercing/Draw /2nd draw /Trimming |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Trimming |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | Press Machine |
Machine / Cell No. | Press shop |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Method | Without Trimming | Without Trimming passed | X |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 5 pic |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | OD Over size 81.0 +/-0.5 Over size 83.9 |
Why 2 | OD Over size 81.0 +/-0.5 Over size 83.9 |
Why 3 | Trimming part size 80.3 & before trimming 83.8 |
Why 4 | Can not inspect by visual inspection |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Occurance) | So Without Trimming component MIX up with ok component |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | OD Over size 81.0 +/-0.5 Over size 83.9 |
Why 2 | OD Over size 81.0 +/-0.5 Over size 83.9 |
Why 3 | Trimming part size 80.3 & before trimming 83.8 |
Why 4 | Can not inspect by visual inspection |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | So Without Trimming component MIX up with ok component |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outflow | Mixup without trimming | Deepak | 13/10/2024 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | Yes |
Change Details | Before -Sampling Inspection .After -100% Inspection by Gauge |
Inspection Method | Gauge |
Other Inspection Method | |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 100% |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Inspection Method Change 1146_Occurance_Before.pdf |
Occurance (After) |
Inspection Method Change 1146_Occurance_After.pdf |
Outflow (Before) |
Inspection Method Change 1146_Outflow_Before.pptx |
Outflow (After) |
Inspection Method Change 1146_Outflow_After.pptx |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | No |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | Press machine / Inspection Gauge |
12. Document Review
Documents | ControlPlan, InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | PFD |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 50 |
Reason for submission | diameter found with in specification. |