QFR No - 8000848504
Defect Details
NC No. 8000848504
NC Date 12/10/2023
NC Submission Date
Part No. B2SG01026O
Part Name PUSH ROD FORK FOR M/CYL 2WH,RE J1C
Supplier Name & Code 100106-SHARP ENGINEERS.
ETL Plant 1120-ETL K-226/2 Disc Brakes
Defect Details THREADING NOT OK-EXCESS THREADING
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description HREADING NOT OK-EXCESS THREADING
Detection Stage Receipt
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 300
Is Defect Repeatative? Yes
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID quality@apw3.co.in
Plant Head/CEO Email ID kurund.ma@sharp-engineers.com
MD Email ID urkhandelwal@sharp-engineers.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
1100
0
0
500
500
2100
Check Qty
1100
0
0
500
500
2100
NG Qty
300
0
0
228
55
583
 
Scrap 583
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
Segregation done immediately at ETL and in-house pipeline material
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
10) RM Inward 20) RM Storage 30) Parting & Forming 40) Milling Operation 50) Drilling60) Taping (M8x1.25-6G)70) Drilling Operation 80) O.D. Grinding 90)Plating Process 100)Inward Inspection 110) Final Inspection 120)Pre-Dispatch Inspection 130) Packing & Forwarding
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation Drilling Operation
Outsource No
Machine / Cell SE/DR/03
Machine / Cell No. Machine Shop
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManUn-skilled OperatorStage wise skill matrix and operator license are not evident as per F/HR/06O
MethodOperator Working Method WrongSOP/WI available on machine and operator aware about it and being followed.O
ToolExcess Tap lengthTapping length was excessX
MachineHolding in the fixture with required pin gaugeSOP/WI available on machine and operator aware about it and being followed.O
MaterialIncorrect RM gradeThird part inspection verified for chemical composition and hardness testing as per requirement.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 1:1
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 THREADING NOT OK-EXCESS THREADING
Why 2 Excess Tap length observed.
Why 3 Non-standard tap used
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Non-standard tap used
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 THREADING NOT OK-EXCESS THREADING
Why 2 Inspector not aware about the defect
Why 3 OPL not displayed at inspection stage
Why 4 New defect phenomena
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Inspector not aware about the defect because of new defect phenomena.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceTap length standardized and sizes are being checked before start of the production.Mr. Vinod Patil14/10/202320/10/2023Completed
OutflowOPL displayed at final inspection stage and training given to inspector for awareness purpose.Mr. Shaikh Laik12/10/202314/10/2023Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details OPL displayed
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Visual Inspection
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 1:1
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Non-standard tap used
579_Occurance_Before.pptx
Occurance (After) Tap length standardized and sizes are being checked before start of the production.
579_Occurance_After.pptx
Outflow (Before) New defect phenomena
579_Outflow_Before.pptx
Outflow (After) OPL displayed at final inspection stage and training given to inspector for awareness purpose.
579_Outflow_After.pptx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant PUSH ROD FORK R121 (B3KC00702O)
 
12. Document Review
Documents PFMEA, WISOP, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document NA
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity
Reason for submission