QFR No - 8000874634
Defect Details
NC No. 8000874634
NC Date 16/05/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. 550HH02302
Part Name O-RING - K7
Supplier Name & Code 100131-KAMAL RUBPLAST IND PVT LTD
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details FITTMENT NOT OK.-DIMN. 3.5 +0.1 UNDERSIZE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description DIMN. 3.5 +0.1 UNDERSIZE
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 40000
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID santosh.s@kamalrub.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID kamalrub@gmail.com
MD Email ID Danish.g@kamalrub.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
40000
0
0
1000
0
41000
Check Qty
40000
0
0
1000
0
41000
NG Qty
40000
0
0
0
0
40000
 
Scrap 0
Rework 40000
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
The subject item has been shifted to the other plant of Kamal. The part does not belong to Endurance . This will ensure further mix up is not happening .
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
Raw Material Receving > Weighing > Mixing (Kneader & Open Mixer) > Lab Testing > Strip Cutting > Moulding > Deflashing > Final inspection(100% Visual) > Packing > PDIR > Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation As above
Outsource No
Machine / Cell JRD Semi Automatic
Machine / Cell No. P-24
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ManLook Like SimilierChecked with Go-Nogo gaugeX
MethodSimilier Part Handling not defineSimilier Part Handling already defineO
MachineMachine running Condition not OKMachine running Condition found - OKO
ToolTool identification number not defineTool identification number already defineO
MaterialMaterial not as per GradeCheck Material Grade material Ok as per lab test Report.O
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method 100% Visual Insp.
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Thickness of O Ring 3.5+0.1 (Significant parameter) under size
Why 2 Due to mix of similar dimension Part
Why 3 Part produce at same place
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Similar Part produce at same place
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Thickness of O Ring 3.5+0.1 (Significant parameter) Mix with Similar Dimension Part
Why 2 Identification Mis match
Why 3 Due to Similar dimension
Why 4 Location not defined
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Location not defined
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceThe subject item has been shifted to the other plant of KamalS. K. Singh15/05/202415/05/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100% Visual Inspection and as per sample basis checked by Go-Nogo gauge.
Inspection Method Other
Other Inspection Method Go-Nogo Gauge
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 500
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) PPT Slide No. 01
811_Occurance_Before.pptx
Occurance (After) PPT Slide No.02
811_Occurance_After.pptx
Outflow (Before) PPT
811_Outflow_Before.pptx
Outflow (After) PPT
811_Outflow_After.pptx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Model
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, PFMEA, WISOP
Specify Other Document WI
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 100
Reason for submission 5. Problem Analysis - Need to cover all 4M 8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions ) - Need out flow side and system side actions