QFR No - 8000862066
Defect Details
NC No. | 8000862066 |
NC Date | 07/02/2024 |
NC Submission Date | |
Part No. | 550DZ04702 |
Part Name | FORK BOLT -UG4.5 |
Supplier Name & Code | 100189-SANGKAJ STEEL PVT LTD. |
ETL Plant | 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension |
Defect Details | NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-M26 THREAD FITMENT ISSUE |
1. Problem Description
Defect Description | M26 Thread fitment NG |
Detection Stage | Inprocess |
Problem Severity | Fitment |
NG Quantity | 161 |
Is Defect Repeatative? | No |
Defect Sketch / Photo |
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID | qualityassurance@sangkaj.com |
Plant Head/CEO Email ID | steel@sangkaj.com |
MD Email ID | anirudh.2007@hotmail.com |
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location | ETL End | Warehouse | Transit | Supplier FG | Supplier WIP | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Qty |
3000
|
0
|
0
|
500
|
0
|
3500
|
Check Qty |
3000
|
0
|
0
|
500
|
0
|
3500
|
NG Qty |
168
|
0
|
0
|
15
|
0
|
183
|
Scrap | 0 |
Rework | 183 |
Under Deviation | 0 |
Containment Action |
---|
100% Sorting done at ETL End & M/s Sangkaj steel end. |
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description |
---|
RM - RM inspection - Wire Drawing - cold forging - cold forging inward - CNC operation - Thread rolling - Plating - Final inspection - Dispatch. |
4. Process Details
Process / Operation | Thread Rolling |
Outsource | No |
Machine / Cell | Thread rolling |
Machine / Cell No. | TRG Rolling. |
5. Problem Analysis
Type | Possible Cause | Fact Verification | Jud |
---|---|---|---|
Man | Skipped from inspection. | NG part found at customer end, | X |
Machine | Less Or more feed mark speed. | Verified the machine parameter & found okay. | O |
Method | Loading & Unloading method not okay at Thread rolling stage. | Gemba visit at rolling operation stage & found okay. | O |
Machine | Less or more RPM | Verified the machine parameter & found okay. | O |
Method | Loading & unloading method not okay at CNC operation. | Gemba visit at CNC operation stage & found okay. | O |
Tool | Thread roll not okay | Verified the thread roll & thread roll not as per standard. | X |
Material | Wrong material used. | verified the material TC & found okay. | O |
Man | Unskilled operator | Verified the skill matrix at operation stage & found okay, | O |
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | On mating part |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | Sampling |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 05 -10nos |
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 | NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-M26 THREAD FITMENT ISSUE |
Why 2 | M26 Thread observed damage mark. |
Why 3 | Rolling impression mark found on part. |
Why 4 | Thread roll damage. |
Why 5 | less thread rolling frequency. |
Root Cause (Occurance) | less thread rolling frequency. |
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 | Skipped from inspection. |
Why 2 | NG part not detect at final inspection. |
Why 3 | Inspection done on sampling basis with mating part. |
Why 4 | |
Why 5 | |
Root Cause (Outflow) | Inspection done on sampling basis with mating part. |
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type | Countermeasure Details | Responsibility | Target Date | Actual Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outflow | Inspection done on Sampling Basis, But the Sample Size Increased. Previously only 05 Nos were Checked for thread during Final Inspection, now Sample Size increased to 30%. | Mrs Mukta | 22/01/2024 | 22/01/2024 | Completed |
Occurance | Frequency increase on thread roll . | Mr Raut. | 01/02/2024 | 01/02/2024 | Completed |
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System | No |
Change Details | N/A |
Inspection Method | Other |
Other Inspection Method | Mating part |
Check Point at Final Inspection | Yes |
Checking Freq. | 100% |
Sampling | No |
Sample Size | 100% |
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) |
Thread rolling frequency is less i.e 50000 nos 660_Occurance_Before.pptx |
Occurance (After) |
Thread rolling frequency is increase from 50000 nos to 40000 nos. 660_Occurance_After.pptx |
Outflow (Before) |
Less inspection frequency. 660_Outflow_Before.pptx |
Outflow (After) |
Inspection done on Sampling Basis, But the Sample Size Increased. Previously only 05 Nos were Checked for thread during Final Inspection, now Sample Size increased to 30%.. 660_Outflow_After.pptx |
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required | Yes |
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant | Applicable for all type of fork bolt. |
12. Document Review
Documents | ControlPlan, PMCheckSheet, PFMEA, InspCheckSheet |
Specify Other Document | N/A |
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity | 364 |
Reason for submission | Verified and found ok |