QFR No - 8000895939
Defect Details
NC No. 8000895939
NC Date 17/10/2024
NC Submission Date
Part No. F2DZ04603B
Part Name FORK BOLT J1A & J1D
Supplier Name & Code 100189-SANGKAJ STEEL PVT LTD.
ETL Plant 1117-ETL K-228/9 Suspension
Defect Details NOT AS PER SPECIFICATION-GROOVE WITH UNDER SIZE
 
1. Problem Description
Defect Description Groove width undersize Specification: 4.5 +0.2 Observation: 2.88
Detection Stage Inprocess
Problem Severity Fitment
NG Quantity 1
Is Defect Repeatative? No
Defect Sketch / Photo
Supplier Communication Details
Quality Head Email ID qualityassurance@sangkaj.com
Plant Head/CEO Email ID steel@sangkaj.com
MD Email ID anirudh.2007@hotmail.com
2. Stock Details & action taken for NG parts
Location ETL End Warehouse Transit Supplier FG Supplier WIP Total
Total Qty
288
0
0
550
300
1138
Check Qty
288
0
0
550
300
1138
NG Qty
0
0
0
0
0
0
 
Scrap 0
Rework 0
Under Deviation 0
Containment Action
All the Material at Endurance & at sangkaj steel checked and no NG part Found
 
3. Process Flow
Process Flow Description
RM Inward and inward Inspection-Wire Drawing-Straightening-Bar Parting-CNC 1st- CNC2nd-Milling-Tapping-plating-Final Inspection-Packing & Dispatch
 
4. Process Details
Process / Operation CNC turning 2nd
Outsource Yes
Machine / Cell CNC Machine
Machine / Cell No. 2
5. Problem Analysis
Type Possible Cause Fact Verification Jud
ToolInsert BrokenDefective piece observed with groove width undersize by1.62mm, which occures only after insert breakX
ManNew operatorRegular and Experienced operator Dployed for Production.O
MaterialInput Material Not OKCut Blanks found ok as all the blanks are cut through same bar.O
MachineVariation due to machineVariation due to Machine not Causes dimension undersize by 1.62mmO
MethodLess Sampling SizeGroove width is checked with width gauge on Sampling basis.X
 
6. Inspection Method Analysis (Current)
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. Sampling
Sampling No
Sample Size 10:100
7. Root Cause Analysis (Occurance)
Why 1 Groove Width Undersize Part Found at Customer End
Why 2 Incomplete Operation is done during Grooving.
Why 3 Insert Broken before the Set Tool Life.
Why 4
Why 5
Root Cause (Occurance) Insert Broken before the Set Tool Life.
 
Root Cause Analysis (Outflow)
Why 1 Groove Width Undersize Part Found at Customer End
Why 2 Defective Parts Skipped from the Final Inspection
Why 3 Part Checked on Sampling basis with slip type width gauge.
Why 4 Less Sampling Size
Why 5
Root Cause (Outflow) Less Sampling Size during Final Inspection.
 
8. Countermeasure ( Occurrence , Outflow & System side Actions )
Type Countermeasure Details Responsibility Target Date Actual Date Status
OccuranceRevalidation of Insert Life is done by varying the Process Parameters. Previous set Life was 800 No`s Per Side. By Setting the Process Parameters at extreme limit of their Specification, the new Insert Life set is 700 No`s.Mr. Santosh Raut22/10/202422/10/2024Completed
OutflowInspection method Changed. 100% Inspection of Groove with Slip type Width Gauge is done During the Final Inspection.Mr. A.A. Joshi22/10/202422/10/2024Completed
 
9. Inspection Method After Customer Complaint
Change In Inspection System Yes
Change Details 100% inspection of Groove with Slip type WIdth Gauge.
Inspection Method Gauge
Other Inspection Method
Check Point at Final Inspection Yes
Checking Freq. 100%
Sampling No
Sample Size 100%
10. Evidance of Countermeasure
Occurance (Before) Tool Life-800 Nos
1157_Occurance_Before.pptx
Occurance (After) Tool Life -700 Nos
1157_Occurance_After.pptx
Outflow (Before) Inspection on Sampling Basis
1157_Outflow_Before.pptx
Outflow (After) 100% Inspection with Width gauge
1157_Outflow_After.pptx
 
11. Horizontal Deployment
Horizontal Deployment Required Yes
Applicable Machine / Model / Plant Fork Bolt AABM
 
12. Document Review
Documents ControlPlan, InspCheckSheet
Specify Other Document No Other
 
13. Effectiveness Of Action
Reviewed Quantity 50
Reason for submission Interlocking required for tool breakage